Swamp rose-mallow (Hibiscus moscheutos) COSEWIC assessment and status report: chapter 11

Technical Summary

Hibiscus moscheutos

Swamp Rose-mallow – Ketmie des marais

Range of Occurrence in Canada:
Ontario

Extent and Area Information

Extent of occurrence (EO) (km²) (Based on GIS calculation of a polygon in which all points at outer limits of range are included):
22,000 km²
Specify trend in EO:
Increasing
Are there extreme fluctuations in EO?
No
Area of occupancy (AO) (km²):
~9.5 km²
Specify trend in AO:
Decline
Are there extreme fluctuations in AO?
Unknown
Number of known or inferred current locations:
51
Specify trend in # :
Increase from 40 to 51(due mainly to increased search effort but 2 may be range extensions)
Are there extreme fluctuations in number of locations?
No
Specify trend in area, extent or quality of habitat:
Declining

Population Information

Generation time (average age of parents in the population):
Several years
Number of mature individuals:
Estimated at thousands (but <10,000)
Total population trend:
Unknown
% decline over the last/next 10 years or 3 generations.
N/A
Are there extreme fluctuations in number of mature individuals?
Likely not
Is the total population severely fragmented?
Likely not since floating mats of plants are observed and seeds are dispersed by water
Specify trend in number of populations:
Seven of the 40 populations surveyed by Ford in 1985 have been extirpated
Are there extreme fluctuations in number of populations?
No
List populations with number of mature individuals in each:

Threats (actual or imminent threats to populations or habitats)

  1. Habitat degradation
  2. Shoreline development
  3. Competition from invasive species

Rescue Effect (immigration from an outside source)

Status of outside population(s)?
USA:  Exists in 27 US states; S1 in Wisconsin; S2 in Rhode Island; S3 in Michigan
Is immigration known or possible?
Yes
Would immigrants be adapted to survive in Canada?
Yes
Is there sufficient habitat for immigrants in Canada?
Yes
Is rescue from outside populationslikely?
Yes

Quantitative Analysis

N/A

Current Status

COSEWIC: Special Concern (1987, 2004)

Sources of information: Fieldwork conducted in 2002 and slightly updated with Aug.- Sept. 2003 field data from A. Woodliffe.

Status and Reasons for Designation

Status:  Special Concern

Alpha-numeric code:   Met criterion for Threatened, D2, but designated Special Concern because it is relatively widespread, found in protected areas, and there is potential for rescue effect.

Reasons for Designation: A robust, perennial herb of shoreline marshes of the Great Lakes present in Ontario at many localities, in very small areas, and generally in low numbers.  The total Canadian population is estimated to consist of fewer than 10,000 plants with some, including two of the largest populations, in protected sites. The species has been subjected historically to habitat loss and several populations have been lost recently. Populations are also at risk from habitat degradation and impact due especially to invasive exotic plants. Evidence of the spread of plants through rafting of floating clumps indicates that rrecolonization of extirpated sites may be possible.

Applicability of Criteria

Criterion A (Declining Total Population: Not met (Insufficient information)

Criterion B (Small Distribution, and Decline or Fluctuation): Not met. The species has a relatively small area of occupancy (<10 km²), is present at many sites, but these are not deemed to be highly fragmented due to the floating seeds and rafting of uprooted plants; no extreme fluctuations occur in population sizes.)

Criterion C (Small Total Population Size and Decline):  Not met. Population size is estimated to consist of < 10,000 plants, meeting the threshold for threatened and continuing decline in mature individuals is suspected due to the spread of invasive exotics but no firm data has been documented and at least two populations have > 1,000 plants.)

Criterion D (Very Small Population or Restricted Distribution): Meets Threatened D2 based on the small area of occupancy and the continued shoreline development at many sites and the rapid expansion and impact of an exotic grass that has had great and increasing impacts in wetlands. Both factors have resulted in recent losses to entire or partial populations. Special Concern is recommended, however, due to the presence of many localities in a series of provincially and federally protected sites such as parks, conservation areas and provincially significant wetlands (including two of the largest populations). Rescue is also possible due to the spread of floating seeds and rafting plants.

Criterion E (Quantitative Analysis): No quantitative analysis available.

Page details

Date modified: