Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards, as per the Policy on Communications and Federal Identity.
Recovery Strategy for the Hill's Thistle (Cirsium hillii) in Canada
- Recommendation And Approval Statement
- Strategic Environmental Assessment Statement
- Recovery Feasibility Summary
- Executive Summary
- 1. Background
- 2. Recovery
- 3. References
- 4. Recovery Team Members
- Appendix A: Effects on the Environment and Other Species
- Appendix B: List of Hill's Thistle Sites
- Appendix C: Sites Where Hill's Thistle is Considered Extirpated
- Appendix D: Maps of Critical Habitat
Strategic Environmental Assessment Statement
A strategic environmental assessment (SEA) is conducted on all Species at Risk Act recovery strategies, in accordance with the Cabinet Directive on the Environmental Assessment of Policy, Plan and Program Proposals (2004). The purpose of a SEA is to incorporate environmental considerations into the development of public policies, plans, and program proposals to support environmentally sound decision-making.
Recovery planning is intended to benefit species at risk and biodiversity in general. However, it is recognized that strategies may also inadvertently lead to environmental effects beyond their intended benefits. Environmental effects, including impacts to non-target species and the environment, were considered during recovery planning, and the results of this evaluation are discussed further in Appendix A (Effects on Other Species and the Environment).
The implementation of this recovery strategy is not expected to have any negative effects on the environment or on non-target species, and in fact is expected to benefit many other species found in the same habitat. However, researchers carrying out field studies, and those conducting monitoring in alvar habitat, need to be cautioned on the potential problem of trampling from their foot traffic, and instructed how to prevent creating such impacts. Whether controlled burning is required to maintain and improve habitat is an important knowledge gap. If burning is found to be a necessary tool for recovery, then an additional SEA would need to be done on this action. This is addressed in Section 1.6 (Knowledge Gaps).
- Date Modified: