Lake whitefish (Coregonus clupeaformis) in Lake Simcoe COSEWIC assessment and status report: chapter 11

Technical Summary

Coregonus clupeaformis

Lake whitefish, Lake Simcoe population – Grand corégone, population du lac Simcoe

Range of Occurrence in Canada:

Ontario

Extent and Area information

extent of occurrence (EO) [see Distribution]:

725 km²

trend:

Stable

are there extreme fluctuations in EO?

No

area of occupancy (AO) [less than EO as the species is not found throughout the lake]:

<725 km²

trend:

Stable

are there extreme fluctuations in AO?

No

number of extant locations:

1

trend in # locations:

Stable

are there extreme fluctuations in # locations?

No

habitat trend:

Decline

Population Information

generation time (average age of parents in the population):

Wild fish - <30 years Stocked fish - 10 years

number of mature individuals (capable of reproduction) in the Canadian population

Estimated to be in the area of 200,000 including stocked fish, which probably represent 90% of whitefish in the lake: Unknown

total population trend:

Wild fish declining

if decline, % decline over the last/next 10 years or 3 generations, whichever is

15 year decline of 60% for wild fish

are there extreme fluctuations in number of mature individuals?

No

is the total population severely fragmented?

No

list each population and the number of mature individuals in each?

Not Applicable

trend in number of populations:

Not Applicable

are there extreme fluctuations in number of populations?

Not Applicable

Threats (actual or imminent threats to populations or habitats)

Rescue Effect (immigration from an outside source)

does species exist elsewhere (in Canada or outside)?

Not the Lake Simcoe strain

status of the outside population(s)?

Good

is immigration known or possible?

No

Would immigrants be adapted to survive here?

Probably

is there sufficient habitat for immigrants here?

No

Quantitative Analysis

Not Done

Existing Status

Nature Conservancy Ranks (Natureserve 2004)

Status and Reasons for DesignationFootnote1

Status:  Data Deficient

Alpha-numeric code: Not Applicable

Reasons for Designation: Although this population is on its way to extirpation, there is inconclusive evidence regarding its distinctiveness and the best evidence available at this time is insufficient to resolve the species’ eligibility for assessment.

Applicability of Criteria

Criterion A (Declining Total Population): The wild component of the population has severely declined and remains depressed (A2b), habitat quality and quantity generally is degraded (A2c), exploitation continues and appears to be increasing (A2d), and exotics continue to threaten the integrity of both the ecosystem and the population (A2e); recovery may be further impacted by hatchery propagation procedures. The wild component qualifies for Endangered; the total population (wild+stocked) qualifies for Threatened; however, there is insufficient evidence to establish eligibility.

Criterion B (Small Distribution, and Decline or Fluctuation): One lake containing one population with a limited or unknown number of stocks present in a continued depressed state. The number of mature wild individuals has declined, appears to consist mostly of very old fish from recruitment events &gt;30 years ago, thus will decline in future as these individuals die from either natural or fishing causes (B2a,b(v)). Although attempts at reversing habitat degradation have occurred and some success has been realized, rehabilitation to levels necessary for population recovery is unlikely; however, there is insufficient evidence to establish eligibility.

Criterion C (Small Total Population Size and Decline): No information regarding actual abundance is available for wild fish, but it is likely quite low relative to what should be present in a lake this size.

Criterion D (Very Small Population or Restricted Distribution): Criterion not met; however, there is insufficient evidence to establish eligibility.

Criterion E (Quantitative Analysis): Data not available; however, there is insufficient evidence to establish eligibility.

Page details

Date modified: