Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards, as per the Policy on Communications and Federal Identity.
Recovery Strategy for Cultus Pygmy Sculpin (Proposed)
- Executive Summary, Species Information and Foreword
- 1. Description of the Species
- 2. Description of Needs of the Species
- 3. Threats
- 4. Habitat Trends
- 5. Habitat Protection
- 6. Critical Habitat
- 7. Recovery Goal
- 8. Recovery Objectives
- 9. Approaches to Meeting Recovery Objectives
- 10. Anticipated Conflicts or Challenges
- 11. Recovery Feasibility
- 12. Recommended Approach / Scale for Recovery
- 13. Knowledge Gaps
- 14. Actions Already Completed and/or Underway
- 15. Statement of when Action Plans Will be Completed
- 16. References Cited
- Appendix I
9. Approaches to Meeting Recovery Objectives
The general approaches recommended in this recovery strategy include:
- establish and support stewardship initiatives,
- undertake specific research activities to fill knowledge gaps and clarify threats,
- delineate and protect1 key habitats,
- minimize impacts from land and water use, and
- design and implement sound monitoring programs.
A description of the recommended strategies and approaches is presented in Table 1. These approaches will be further detailed in one or more Action Plans, to be developed with the participation of a Recovery Implementation Group (RIG) or alternative working group. Further plans and decisions may require involvement of stakeholders and participants including government agencies, First Nations, private land owners, industry and local stewardship groups.
|Necessary||Establish and support a Recovery Implementation Group (RIG) or alternative working group for Cultus pygmy sculpin.||Has a RIG or working group been established?|
Is the RIG adequately supported with funding and technical expertise?
Has an Action Plan been developed?
Is the RIG achieving the goals outlined in the Recovery Strategy?
|Necessary||Assess taxonomic status of Cultus pygmy sculpin.||Undertake phylogenetic studies to clarify taxonomic status relative to C. aleuticus.||Has taxonomic status of Cultus pygmy sculpin been clarified?|
|Necessary||Address information gaps that inhibit conservation of Cultus pygmy sculpin.|
Address key information gaps including:
|Are there key information gaps that inhibit conservation of Cultus pygmy sculpin?|
|Primary||Clarify and address threats to Cultus pygmy sculpin.|
Undertake appropriate research to clarify threats, including:
|Have threats been clarified and assessed? |
Are threats being mitigated?
|Primary||Conduct studies to help define critical habitat for Cultus pygmy sculpin.||Undertake necessary research to define critical habitat and to delineate it in the wild. See Section 6.2 for a list of necessary research activities.||Has critical habitat been defined for Cultus pygmy sculpin?|
|Primary||Develop and implement a long-term monitoring program.|
Recovery Team and RIG to develop a monitoring program to assess population response to management activities or threats. Monitoring may include:
Exercise care to ensure that census methods do not impact the population.
RIG will need to secure long term funding to ensure implementation of an effective monitoring program. Monitoring priorities will need to be set within the constraints of available budget.
|Have monitoring programs been implemented?|
How long has a monitoring program been in place?
Is it effective?
Is it a benign activity for the population?
Is funding secure for the long term?
|Secondary||Develop a watershed-scale land use plan that identifies and protects key areas, and ensures that cumulative impacts of development in the watershed do not adversely impact key habitats.||RIG will work with stakeholders to ensure that watershed development plans for the drainage protect key habitats. Carefully consider threats to Cultus pygmy sculpin, and exercise caution (in favour of conservation) when planning/regulating/enforcing land development, water use and fisheries regulations.||Have key areas in the watershed (i.e., those that are disproportionately important for maintaining habitat) been identified?|
Has a watershed plan that recognizes these habitats as important been developed?
Have key habitats been effectively protected?
|Secondary||Establish water quality and water use objectives for Cultus Lake.||Have water quality and water use objectives been established and communicated to relevant regulators and stakeholders?|
|Secondary||Inform and educate stakeholders and the general public about the species and general biodiversity values.|
RIG to work with government agencies and educators to develop
|Have educational materials been produced? |
Has public perception and awareness been affected?
How many classes have received educational presentations?
|Secondary||Jointly develop land management strategies for crown and private lands.||Develop criteria for assessing effects of land developments on aquatic habitats and develop guidelines for good stewardship. For private lands, work with land owners to encourage good stewardship. Develop and implement Best Management Practices (BMPs), as needed. Develop and use conservation covenants and stewardship agreements where useful.||Have land management criteria been developed?|
Is land development meeting the criteria?
Have BMPs been developed and communicated?
Is there compliance with BMPs?
|Secondary||Develop sound protocols for scientific investigations (e.g., limit number of fish collected each year, etc.)||Recovery Team to work with government agencies to set boundaries for experimental work and collection activities. Note: SARA permits are required to legally collect and undertake research on a listed wildlife species.||Have scientific investigation protocols been set and communicated?|
Have they been implemented?
1 Protection can be achieved through a variety of mechanisms including: voluntary stewardship agreements, conservation covenants, sale by willing vendors on private lands, land use designations, and protected areas.
2 Priority has been assigned based on professional judgement into one of three groups, from highest to lowest: necessary, primary, secondary.
3 Performance measures plot the progress toward meeting the stated objectives. The performance measures are presented here as questions, the answers to which can be plotted in time to monitor progress.
- Date Modified: