Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards, as per the Policy on Communications and Federal Identity.
Recovery Strategy For Northern Riffleshell, Snuffbox, Round Pigtoe, Mudpuppy Mussel and Rayed Bean in Canada [Proposed]
- Executive Summary
- Species information: Northern Riffleshell
- Species Information: Snuffbox
- Species Information: Round Pigtoe
- Species Information: Mudpuppy Mussel
- Species Information: Rayed Bean
- Habitat: Northern Riffleshell
- Habitat: Snuffbox
- Habitat: Round Pigtoe
- Habitat: Mudpuppy Mussel
- Habitat: Rayed Bean
- Habitat Role
- Importance and Feasibility
- Recovery Approaches: Research and Monitoring Approches
- Recovery Approaches: Management
- Recovery Approaches: Stewarship and Awareness
- Potential impacts, actions completed and evaluation
- Appendix A:Record of Cooperation and Consultation
12. Critical Habitat
Critical Habitat is defined in SARA as the habitat required for the survival or recovery of a listed species. The identification of Critical Habitat requires a thorough knowledge of the species needs during all life stages as well as an understanding of the distribution, quantity, and quality of habitat across the range of the species. At present, this information is not available for these species although Table 2 outlines activities that would assist with obtaining the required information. The activities listed in Table 2 are not exhaustive but outline the range and scope of actions identified by the OFMRT as necessary to identify critical habitat for all five species. It is likely that the process of investigating the actions in Table 2 will lead to the discovery of further knowledge gaps that will have to be addressed. Until Critical Habitat can be defined the OFMRT has identified the areas listed in the Currently Occupied Habitat and Historically Occupied Habitat sections as areas in need of conservation.
|Activity||Approximate Time Frame 1|
|Conduct mussel population surveys||2006-2008|
|Assess habitat conditions in occupied areas (e.g., flow, substrate, water clarity and quality)||2006-2008|
|Determine any life stage differences in habitat use||2007-2009|
|Survey and map areas of suitable but unused habitat within historical range||2008-2010|
|Assess genetic structure of populations||2006-2008|
|Complete host fish studies||2006 - 2008|
|Conduct host fish population surveys||2006-2008|
|Assess habitat use by host species||2006-2008|
|Determine areas of overlap between mussel and host habitat||2009-2010|
1timeframes are subject to change as new priorities arise or as a result of changing demands on resources or personnel
13. Habitat Trend
The loss of these five mussel species from historical habitat in the Lower Great Lakesregion can be largely attributed to the detrimental effects of Dreissenid mussels including competition for food, resources and space. The introduction and spread of the zebra and quagga mussel throughout the Great Lakes in the late 1980s decimated native mussel populations (Schloesser et al. 1996). Native mussel communities were virtually extirpated from the offshore waters of western Lake Erie by 1990 (Schloesser and Nalepa 1994) and the offshore waters of Lake St. Clair by 1994 (Nalepa et al. 1996). The mussel communities of Lake Erie were already in decline, probably due to a general decline in water quality over the past 40 years (Nalepa et al. 1991), but Lake St. Clair still supported an abundant and diverse mussel assemblage as recently as 1986 (Nalepa and Gauvin 1988). The continue presence of Dreissenid mussels throughout much of the historical range of these species results in large areas of formally suitable habitat remaining unavailable.
The Round Pigtoe was recently reported from three sites in the St Clair delta; however, repeated sampling of the same sites reported declines in all three sites. Isolated patches of the Northern Riffleshell continue to survive in some nearshore wetland areas with very shallow water, a high degree of connectivity to the lake (which ensures access to host fishes), and harsh conditions for zebra mussels (high water temperatures and considerable wave action in summer; ice scour in winter). However, such “refugia” are rare, and most of the mussel habitat in the Great Lakeshas been permanently lost (COSEWIC 2003).
The Northern Riffleshell and Snuffbox historically occurred in the Ausable, Grand and Thames rivers and may still have remnant populations in the Ausable and Thames rivers. The Round Pigtoe historically occurred in the Thames and Grand rivers, and remnant populations have been identified in both watersheds. The Mudpuppy Mussel and Rayed Bean historically only occurred in the Sydenham and Thames rivers. In the Ausable River, former habitat has been lost due to siltation, high turbidity levels, alterations to the flow regime, toxic contaminants, thermal changes, and exotic species. In the Grand River, untreated wastewater inputs from major urban centres likely contributed to the declines. In the Thames River, agricultural impacts such as siltation and turbidity, nutrient loading, toxic compounds, altered water flow, barriers to movement, as well as non-native species, and thermal pollution have all contributed to the degradation of habitat for these five mussel species.
14. Habitat Protection
The federal Species at Risk Act (SARA) was proclaimed in June of 2003. Under SARA there are general prohibitions against killing, harming, taking, possessing, capturing, and collecting these mussels and against damaging or destroying its residences, as well as prohibitions on the destruction of Critical Habitat. The Fisheries Act represents an important tool for habitat protection and along with other federal environmental legislation is complimentary to the Species at Risk Act. Under the federal Fisheries Act mussels are considered shellfish, falling under the definition of ‘fish’, and their habitat is therefore protected from harmful alteration, disruption or destruction unless authorized by the Minister of Fisheries and Oceans, or his/her delegate. Planning authorities must be consistent with the provincial Policy Statement under Section 3 of Ontario’s Planning Act, which prohibits development and site alteration in the significant habitat of endangered species. The Ontario Lakes and Rivers Improvement Act prohibits the impoundment or diversion of a watercourse if siltation will result while the voluntary Land Stewardship II program of the Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs is designed to reduce erosion on agricultural lands. Stream-side development in Ontario is managed through floodplain regulations enforced by local conservation authorities.
15. Ecological Role
Freshwater mussels play an integral role in the functioning of aquatic ecosystems. Vaughn and Hakenkamp (2001) have summarized much of the literature relating to the role of unionids and identified numerous water column (size-selective filter-feeding; species-specific phytoplankton selection; nutrient cycling; control of phospohorus abundance) and sediment processes (deposit feeding decreasing sediment organic matter; biodeposition of feces and pseudofeces; epizoic invertebrates and epiphytic algae colonize shells; benthic invertebrate densities positively correlated with mussel density) mediated by the presence of mussel beds. Welker and Walz (1998) have demonstrated that freshwater mussels are capable of limiting plankton in European rivers while Neves and Odom (1989) reported that mussels also play a role in the transfer of energy to the terrestrial environment through predation by muskrats and raccoons.
- Date Modified: