Warning This Web page has been archived on the Web.

Archived Content

Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards, as per the Policy on Communications and Federal Identity.

Skip booklet index and go to page content

Recovery Strategy for the Grey Whale (Atlantic population) in Canada [Proposed]

Recovery Strategy for the Grey Whale (Eschrichtius robustus), Atlantic Population, in Canada (PROPOSED)

June 2007

Recovery of this species is considered not technically or biologically feasible at this time

Recommended citation:

Department of Fisheries and Oceans.  2007. Recovery Strategy for the Grey Whale (Atlantic population) (Eschrichtius robustus) in Canada [Proposed].  Species at Risk Act Recovery Strategy Series. Department of Fisheries and Oceans, Ottawa.  iv + 8 pp.

Additional copies:

You can download additional copies from the SARA Public Registry (http://www.sararegistry.gc.ca/)

Cover illustration: J. Domm for Fisheries and Oceans Canada.

Également disponible en français sous le titre : « Programme de rétablissement pour la baleine grise (Eschrichtius robustus) dans les eaux canadiennes de l’Atlantique»

© Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, represented by the Minister of Fisheries and Oceans, 2007. All rights reserved.

ISBN to come

Catalogue no. to come

Content (excluding the cover illustration) may be used without permission, with appropriate credit to the source.

Declaration (recovery not feasible)

This proposed recovery strategy for the grey whale (Atlantic population) has been prepared in cooperation with the jurisdictions responsible for the species, as described in the Preface.  The Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO) has reviewed and accepts this document as its recovery strategy for the grey whale (Atlantic population) as required by the Species at Risk Act(SARA).

The recovery of the grey whale (Atlantic population) in Canada is neither technically nor biologically feasible at this time.  Because the population has been extirpated, as well as the unlikeliness of reintroduction of a viable population from a donor population, and the non-existence of an adjacent population to support natural recovery,recovery efforts targeted towards other species in the same geographic area or experiencing similar threats, general conservation programs in the same geographic area, and protection through SARA prohibitions protecting individuals of the species, their residences, and critical habitat will not be effective in re-establishing this population.  Recovery could only occur through reintroduction of the species, which is considered not feasible at this time.    

The feasibility determination will be re-evaluated as warranted in response to changing conditions and/or knowledge and, at least every five years as part of the mandatory report on implementation of the recovery strategy.

Responsibles Juridictions

Under the Species at Risk Act, Fisheries and Oceans Canada is the responsible jurisdiction for the grey whale.

Authors

This document was prepared by Howard Powles (University of Ottawa), and has benefited by reviews from John Loch, (Loch Consulting).

Strategic environmental assessment statement

In accordance with the Cabinet Directive on the Environmental Assessment of Policy, Plan and Program Proposals, the purpose of a SEA is to incorporate environmental considerations into the development of public policies, plans, and program proposals to support environmentally-sound decision making.

Recovery planning is intended to benefit species at risk and biodiversity in general. However, it is recognized that strategies may also inadvertently lead to environmental effects beyond the intended benefits. The planning process based on national guidelines directly incorporates consideration of all environmental effects, with a particular focus on possible impacts on non-target species or habitats.

Because the Atlantic population of grey whale is extirpated and recovery has been determined to be not feasible, no further recovery action is considered appropriate at this time.  Accordingly, this recovery strategy will have no effect on the environment.

Residence

SARA defines residence as: “a dwelling-place, such as a den, nest or other similar area or place, that is occupied or habitually occupied by one or more individuals during all or part of their life cycles, including breeding, rearing, staging, wintering, feeding or hibernating[SARA S2(1)].

Residence protection is a SARA requirement that is separate from recovery strategy development as it relates to the general prohibitions under the Act (Section 33). To facilitate protection, residence descriptions, or the rationale for why the residence concept does not apply to a given species, are posted on the SARA public registry: http://www.sararegistry.gc.ca/plans/residence_e.cfm.  

In the case of an extirpated species for which the recovery strategy does not recommend its reintroduction into the wild in Canada, the prohibition pertaining to the damage or destruction of residence does not apply [SARA S33].

Preface

Fisheries and Oceans Canada has led the development of this recovery strategy for the Atlantic population of grey whale.  The development of the recovery strategy has involved: (i) the preparation of a draft addressing SARA requirements for recovery strategies for extirpated species; (ii) the circulation of this draft for review and comment by the provincial governments of Québec, New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, Prince Edward Island, and Newfoundland & Labrador; (iii) public consultations on the draft strategy; and (iv) finalisation of the proposed version for posting on the SARA public registry. 

The determination that recovery is not feasible, including the justification, was reviewed as part of the review and consultation process for the recovery strategy.  The final decision and wording of the determination were the responsibility of the DFO and took account of the comments received.