Andersonie charmante (Bryoandersonia illecebra) programme de rétablissement : chapitre 9

Ouvrages cités

Allen, G.M., P.F.J. Eagleset S.D. Price (éd.).1990. Conserving Carolinian Canada: Conservation Biology in the Deciduous Forest Region, University of Waterloo Press, Waterloo, CANADA, 346 p.

Ambrose, J.D., et D. Kirk. 2004. DRAFT National Recovery Strategy for Red Mulberry (Morus rubra L.) 2005-2010, Équipe de rétablissement du Mûrier rouge, ix + 28 p.

Argus, G.W. 1992. The phytogeography of rare vascular plants in Ontario and its bearing on plant conservation, Canadian Journal of Botany 70:469-490.

Argus, G.W., et K.M. Pryer.1990. Rare Vascular Plants in Canada – Our Natural Heritage, Musée canadien de la nature, Ottawa, CANADA, 191 p.

Barrett, S.C.H., et J.R. Kohn. 1991. Genetic and evolutionary consequences of small population size in plants: Implications for Conservation, p. 3-30, in D.A. Falk et K.E. Holsinger (éd.), Genetics and Conservation of Rare Plants, Oxford University Press, Inc., New York, ÉTATS-UNIS, 283 p.

Bopp, M. 1983. Developmental physiology of bryophytes, in R.M. Schuster (éd.), New Manual of Bryology (Vol. 1) Hattori Botanical Laboratory, JAPON, 626 p.

Burton, M.A.S. 1990. Terrestrial and aquatic bryophytes as monitors of environmental contaminants in urban and industrial habitats, Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 104:267-280.

Cadotte, M.W., et J. Lovett-Doust. 2002. Ecological and taxonomic differences between rare and common plants of southwestern Ontario, Ecoscience 9:397-406.

Centre d'information sur le patrimoine naturel de l’Ontario. 2005. Définitions des classifications provinciales (en ligne). http://www.mnr.gov.on.ca/MNR/nhic/glossary/srank.cfm[consulté en février 2005].

Cleavitt, N.L. 2002. Relating rarity and phylogeny to the autecology of mosses: a comparative study of three rare-common species pairs in the Front Ranges of Alberta, Canada, thèse de doctorat, University of Alberta, 293 p.

Cleavitt, N.L. 2005. Patterns, hypotheses and processes in the biology of rare bryophytes, The Bryologist (submitted).

COSEPAC (Comité sur la situation des espèces en péril au Canada). 2003a. Évaluation et Rapport de situation du COSEPAC sur l’andersonie charmante (Bryoandersonia illecebra) au Canada, Comité sur la situation des espèces en péril au Canada, Ottawa, vii + 32 p.

COSEPAC. 2003b. Processus et critères d’évaluation du COSEPAC. http://www.cosewic.gc.ca/pdf/French/Assessment_process_f.pdf[consulté en février 2005].

Crum, H.A., et L.E. Anderson. 1981. Mosses of Eastern North America, Columbia University Press, New York, ÉTATS-UNIS, 1328 p.

During, H.J. 1979. Life strategies of bryophytes: A preliminary review, Lindbergia 5:2-17.

During, H.J. 1997. Bryophyte diaspore banks, Advances in Bryology 6:103-134.

Ellstrand, N.C., et D.R. Elam. 1993. Population genetic consequences of small population size: Implications for plant conservation, Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 24:217-242.

Environnement Canada. 2001. La conservation des espèces transfrontalières :

Un partenariat entre le Canada et les États-Unis, ministre des Travaux publics et des Services gouvernementaux du Canada en collaboration avec le U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, 25 p.

Environnement Canada. 2004. Programme de rétablissement des espèces en péril -- Document de discussion : L’habitat essentiel (27 février 2004). http://www.sararegistry.gc.ca/virtual_sara/files/policies/Critical%20Habitat%20Discussion%20Paper_f.pdf.

Gemmell, A.R. 1950. Studies in the bryophyta I, The influence of sexual mechanism on varietal production and distribution of British Musci, New Phytologist 49:64-71.

Glime, J.M. 1992. Effects of pollutants on aquatic species, in J.W. Bates et A.M. Farmer (éd.), Bryophytes and Lichens in a Changing Environment, Clarendon Press, Oxford, ROYAUME-UNI, 404 p.

Gould, R. 2005.B. illecebrafield notes: Spoon-leaved Moss Regulation Project Dec. 2004, district d’Aylmer, ministère des Richesses naturelles de l’Ontario (inédit).

Helenurm, K. 1998. Outplanting and differential source population success in Lupinus guadalupensis, Conservation Biology 12:118-127.

Ireland, R.R., et L.M.Ley. 1992. Atlas of Ontario Mosses. Syllogeus 70, Musée canadien de la nature, Ottawa, CANADA, 138 p.

Kallio, P., et E. Saarnio. 1986. The effect of mosses of transplantation to different latitudes, Journal of Bryology 14:159-178.

Keddy, P.A., et C.G. Drummond. 1996. Ecological properties for the evaluation, management, and restoration of temperate deciduous forest ecosystems, Ecological Applications 6:748-762.

Klinkenberg, R., J.M. Bowleset M. Kanter. 1990. Summary report on the Kent-Elgin NaturalAreas Survey, in G.M. Allen, P.F.J. Eagles et S.D. Price (éd.), Conserving Carolinian Canada: Conservation Biology in the Deciduous Forest Region, University of Waterloo Press, Waterloo, CANADA, 346 p.

Kooijman, A.M., et B. Beltman. 1994. Extinction and reintroduction of the bryophyte Scorpidium scorpiodes in a rich-fen site in the Netherlands, Biological Conservation 69:87-96.

Kutner, L.S., et L.E. Morse. 1996. Reintroduction in a changing climate, p. 23-48, in D.A. Falk, C.I. Millar et M. Olwell (éd.), Restoring Diversity: Strategies for Reintroduction of Endangered Plants, Island Press, Washington, ÉTATS-UNIS, 505 p.

Lande, R. 1993. Risks of population extinction from demographic and environmental stochasticityand random catastrophes, The American Naturalist 142:911-927.

Lepp, N.W., et D. Salmon. 1999. A field study of the ecotoxicology of copper to bryophytes, Environmental Pollution 106:153-156.

Lesica, P., et F.W. Allendorf. 1992. Are small populations of plants worth preserving? Conservation Biology 6:135-139.

Lesica, P., et F.W. Allendorf. 1995. When are peripheral populations valuable for conservation? Conservation Biology 9:753-760.

Longton, R.E. 1976. Reproductive biology and evolutionary potential in bryophytes, Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory 41:205-223.

Longton, R.E. 1984. The role of bryophytes in terrestrial ecosystems, Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory 55:147-163.

Longton, R.E. 1992a. Reproduction and rarity in British mosses, Biological Conservation 59:89-98.

Longton, R.E. 1992b. The role of bryophytes and lichens in terrestrial ecosystems, in J.W. Bates et A.M. Farmer (éd.), Bryophytes and Lichens in a Changing Environment, Clarendon Press, Oxford, ANGLETERRE, 404 p.

Longton, R.E. 1997. Reproductive biology and life history strategies, Advances in Bryology 6:65-101.

Longton, R.E., et R.M. Schuster. 1983. Reproductive Biology, in R.M. Schuster (éd.), New Manual of Bryology (Vol. 1) Hattori Botanical Laboratory, JAPON, 626 p.

Maycock, P.F. 1963. The phytosociology of the deciduous forests of extreme southern Ontario, Canadian Journal of Botany 41:379-438.

Maycock, P.F., et D. Fahselt. 1987. An inventory of ecologically significant natural vegetation in the Province of Ontario: I. Essex County, Canadian Field Naturalist 101:474-487.

Menges , E.S. 1990. Population viability analysis for an endangered plant, Conservation Biology 4:52-62.

Menges , E.S. 1991. The application of the minimum viable population theory to plants, p. 45-61, in D.A. Falk et K.E. Holsinger (éd.), Genetics and Conservation of Rare Plants, Oxford University Press, Inc., New York, ÉTATS-UNIS, 283 p.

Miles, C.J., et R.E. Longton. 1992. Deposition of moss spores in relation to distance from the parent gametophytes, Journal of Bryology 17:355-368.

Ministèredel’Environnementde l’Ontario. 2004. Air Quality in Ontario 2003 Report, Queen’s Printer for Ontario, PIBs 4949e.

Ministère des Richesses naturelles de l’Ontario. 2004. Liste des espèces en péril en l'Ontario, in section des espèces en péril du ministère des Richesses naturelles de l’Ontario. http://www.ontarioparks.com/saro-list-fr.pdf [consulté en février 2005].

Ministère des Richesses naturelles de l’Ontario. 2005. La province protège les espèces en péril, Ajoute trois nouvelles espèces végétales à la liste des espèces en voie de disparition. http://www.mnr.gov.on.ca/MRN/csb/news/2005/dec2nr_05.html [consulté en décembre 2005]

Mishler , B.D. 1988. Reproductive ecology of bryophytes, in J. Lovett Doust et L. Lovett Doust (éd.), Plant Reproductive Ecology: Patterns and Strategies, Oxford University Press, Inc., New York, ÉTATS-UNIS, 344 p.

MissouriBotanicalGarden. 2005. Enregistrements de l’herbier (en ligne) http://mobot.mobot.org/W3T/Search/most.html[consulté en février 2005]

Mogensen , G.S. 1981. The biological significance of morphological characters in bryophytes: the spore, The Bryologist 94:187-207.

Morse , L.E. 1996. Plant rarity and endangerment in North America, p. 7-22, in D.A. Falk, C.I. Millar et M. Olwell (éd.), Restoring Diversity: Strategies for Reintroduction of Endangered Plants, Island Press, Washington, ÉTATS-UNIS, 505 p.

Nantel, P., et D. Gagnon. 1999. Variability in the dynamics of northern peripheral versus southern populations of two clonal plant species, Helianthus divaricatus and Rhus aromatica, Journal of Ecology 87:748-760.

NatureServe. 2002. Element Occurrence Data Standard (ébauche du 6 février 2002). http://whiteoak.natureserve.org/eodraft/all.pdf[consulté en février 2005].

NewYork Botanical Garden. 2005. Enregistrements de l’herbier (en ligne) http://scisun.nybg.org:8890/searchdb/owa/wwwspecimen.search_list?taxon=Bryoandersonia+illecebra&projcode=BRYO [consulté en février 2005].

Oldham , M.J. 1990. Provincially rare plants of the Carolinian zone, in G.M. Allen, P.F.J. Eagles et S.D. Price (éd.), Conserving Carolinian Canada: Conservation Biology in the Deciduous Forest Region, University of Waterloo Press, Waterloo, CANADA, 346 p.

Pharo, E.J., D.B. Lindenmayer et N. Taws. 2004. The effects of large-scale fragmentation on bryophytes in temperate forests, Journal of Applied Ecology 41:910-921.

Poirier, M., R. Morris et G. Hall. 1982. Humberstone Marsh and Willoughby Marsh Conservation Areas Master Plan, Office de protection de la nature de la péninsule du Niagara, inédit.

Rao , D.N. 1982. Responses of bryophytes to air pollution, in A.J.E. Smith (éd.), Bryophyte Ecology, Chapman and Hall, London, ROYAUME-UNI, 511 p.

Robinson , H.A. 1962. Generic revision of the North American Brachytheciaceae, The Bryologist 65:73-146.

Rochefort, L., et D.F. Bastien. 1998. Reintroduction of Sphagnum spp. in a harvested peatland: study of several methods to protect against dessication, Ecoscience 5:117-127.

Rochefort, L., Q. François, S. Campeau, K. Johnson et T. Malterer. 2003. North American approach to the restoration of Sphagnum dominated peatlands, Wetlands Ecology and Management 11:3-20.

Rohrer, J.R. 1982. Sporophyte production and sexuality of mosses in two northern Michigan habitats, The Bryologist 85:394-400.

Schemske, D.W., B.C. Husband, M.H. Ruckelhaus, C. Goodwillie, I.M. Parker et J.G. Bishop . Evaluating approaches to the conservation of rare and endangered plants, Ecology 75:584-606.

Schofield , W.B. 1985. Introduction to Bryology, Macmillan Publishing Company, New York, xvi + 431 p.

Shacklette, H.T. 1967. Copper mosses as indicators of metal concentrations, U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 1198-G, 18 p.

Shaw , A. J. 1993. Population biology of the rare copper moss, Scopelophila cataractae, American Journal of Botany 80:1034-1041.

Slack , N.G. 1988. The ecological importance of lichens and bryophytes, in T. Nash et V. Wirth (éd.), Lichens, Bryophytes, and Air Quality, Cramer (Berlin) ALLEMAGNE, 297 p.

Slack , N.G. 1990. Bryophytes and ecological niche theory, Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 104:187-213.

Stoneburner, A., D.N. Lane et L.E. Anderson . 1992. Spore dispersal distances in the moss Atrichum angustatum (Polytrichaceae), The Bryologist 95:324-326.

UK Biodiversity Action Plan. 2005. Base de données (en ligne) sur les plans d’action pour les mousses rares. http://www.ukbap.org.uk/SpeciesGroup.aspx?ID=22[consulté en février 2005].

Young , A., T. Boyle et T. Brown . 1996. The population genetic consequences of habitat fragmentation for plants, Trends in Ecology and Evolution 11:413-418.

Vitt, D.H., et R.J. Belland. 1997. Attributes of rarity among Alberta mosses: Patterns and predictions of species diversity, The Bryologist 100:1-12.

Walker, K.V., M.B. Davis et S. Sugita. 2002. Climate change and shifts in potential tree species range limits in the Great Lakes Region, Journal of Great Lakes Research 28:555-567.

Wiklund, K.. et H. Rydin. 2004. Ecophysiological constraints on spore establishment in bryophytes, Functional Ecology 18:907-913.

Wyatt , R. 1982. Population ecology of bryophytes, Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory 52:179-198.

Zechmeister, H.G., et D. Moser. 2001. The influence of agricultural land-use intensity on bryophyte species richness, Biodiversity and Conservation 10:1609-1625.

 

 

 

Détails de la page

Date de modification :