Avertissement Cette page Web a été archivée dans le Web.

Contenu archivé

Information archivée dans le Web à des fins de consultation, de recherche ou de tenue de documents. Cette dernière n'a aucunement été modifiée ni mise à jour depuis sa date de mise en archive. Les pages archivées dans le Web ne sont pas assujetties aux normes qui s'appliquent aux sites Web du gouvernement du Canada. Conformément à la Politique sur les communications et l'image de marque.

Sauter l'index du livret et aller au contenu de la page

l’oponce de l’Est (Opuntia humifusa)

Ouvrages cités

Addicott, J.F. 1986.Variation in the costs and benefits of mutualism: the interaction between Yuccas and Yucca Moths. Oecologia 70:486-494.

Addicott, J.F., J. Bronstein, et F. Kjellberg. 1990. Evolution of mutualistic life-cycles: Yucca Moths and fig wasps, in Gilbert, F. (éd). Insect Life Cycles: Genetics, Evolution and Co-ordination. Springer, Londres. p. 143-161.

Addicott, J.F. 1995. Ecology of mutualism. Encycl. Environ. Biol. 1:601-611.

Addicott, J.F., et A.J. Tyre. 1995. Cheating in an obligate mutualism: how often do Yucca Moths benefit Yuccas? Oikos 72:382-394.

Aker, C.L. et D. Udovic. 1981. Oviposition and pollination behaviour of the Yucca Moth, Tegeticula maculata (Lepidoptera: Prodoxidae), and its relation to the reproductive biology of Yucca whipplei (Agavaceae). Oecologia 49:96-101.

ANHIC. 2001. Dry Mixedgrass Subregion. Alberta. Centre d’information sur le patrimoine naturel. URL : http://www.gov.ab.ca/env/parks/anhic/drymxgrs.html [Dernière révision :10 décembre 1999].

Baker, H.G. 1986. Yuccas and Yucca Moths - a historical commentary.Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 73:556-564.

Coolidge, K.R. 1909. Preoccupied genera in Lepidoptera. Entomological News 20:112.

COSEPAC. 1999. Improving the COSEWIC species at risk designation process: report of the COSEWIC-IUCN Alignment Working Group. 17 p.

COSEPAC. 2002. Base de données. Comité sur la situation des espèces en péril au Canada. URL : http://www.cosewic.gc.ca/fra/sct1/index_f.cfm [Dernière mise à jour : 23 juillet 2002].

Csotonyi, J.T., et D. Hurlburt. 1999. Update status report for Soapweed (Yucca glauca).Comité sur la situation des espèces en péril au Canada, Ottawa (Ontario).11 p.

Davis, D.R. 1967. A revision of the moths of the subfamily Prodoxinae. U.S.Nat. Museum Bull.255:1-170.

Dodd, R.J. 1989. Coevolutionary dynamics between Yucca glauca and Tegeticula yuccasella along an elevational transect in the Front Range of Colorado. Mémoire de maîtrise, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO. 77 p.

Dodd, R.J., et Y.B. Linhart. 1994. Reproductive consequences of interactions between Yucca glauca (Agavaceae) and Tegeticula yuccasella (Lepidoptera) in Colorado. Am. J. Bot. 81:815-825.

Engelmann, G. 1972a. The flower of Yucca and its fertilization.  Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 3(7):33.

Engelmann, G. 1972b. Note. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 3(8):37.

Fairbarns, M.D. 1984. Status report on Soapweed Yucca glauca, a rare species in Canada. Comité sur le statut des espèces menacées de disparition au Canada, Ottawa (Ontario). 10 p.

Fuller, O. S. 1990. Factors affecting the balance of co‑operation and conflict between the Yucca Moth, Tegeticula yuccasella and its mutualist, Yucca glauca. – Thèse de doctorat, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM. 91 p.

Hurlburt, D. 2001. Status of Soapweed (Yucca glauca) in Alberta. Alberta Environment, Fisheries and Wildlife Management Division, and Alberta Conservation Association, Wildlife Status Report No. 35, Edmonton (Alberta). 18 p.

James, M.L. 1998. Limits on the exploitation of the Yucca-Yucca Moth mutualism. Mémoire de maîtrise, University of Alberta, Edmonton (Alberta). 107 p.

Johnston, A. 1987. Plants and the Blackfoot. Occasional Paper No. 15, Lethbridge Historical Society, Lethbridge, Alberta., 68 p.

Keeley, J.E., .S.C. Keeley, C.C. Swift, et J. Lee. 1984. Seed predation due to the Yucca‑moth symbiosis. Am. Midl. Nat. 112: 187‑191.

Kerley, G.I.H., Tiver, F. and W.G. Whitford. 1993. Herbivory of clonal populations: cattle browsing affects reproduction and population structure of Yucca elata.Oecologia93:12-17.

Kingsolver, R.W. 1984. Population biology of a mutualistic association: Yucca glauca and Tegeticula yuccasella. Thèse de doctorat, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS. 130 p.

Lesica, F., et F.W. Allendorf. 1995. When are peripheral populations valuable forconservation? Conserv. Biol. 9:753-760.

Lomolino, M.V., et R. Channell. 1998. Range collapse, re-introductions, and biogeographic guidelines for conservation. Conserv.Biol.12:481-484.

Marr, D.L., J. Leebens-Mack, L. Elms, et O. Pellmyr. 2000. Pollen dispersal in Yucca filamentosa (Agavaceae): The paradox of self-pollination behavior by Tegeticula Yuccasella (Prodoxidae). Am. J. Bot. 87:670-677.

Massey, L.K., et J.L. Hamrick. 1998. Genetic diversity and population structure of Yucca filamentosa (Agavaceae). Am. J. Bot. 85: 340-345.

Milner, B.J. 1977. Habitat of Yucca glauca Nutt. in southern Alberta. Mémoire de maîtrise, University of Alberta, Edmonton (Alberta). 72 p.

Moravec, D.L. 1994. Flowering phenology and fruit reproductive success of Yucca glauca Nuttall in Western Nebraska. Mémoire de maîtrise, University of Nebraska, Lincoln. 128 p.

NatureServe. 2003. NatureServe Explorer: An online encyclopedia of life [application Web].Version 1.8. NatureServe, Arlington, Virginie. http://www.natureserve.org/explorer. (Date de la dernière consultation : 8 juillet 2003 ).

Pellmyr, O. 1999. Systematic revision of the Yucca Moths in the Tegeticula yuccasellacomplex (Lepidoptera: Prodoxidae) north of Mexico. Syst. Ent. 24:243-271.

Pellmyr, O. et J. Leebens-Mack. 2001. Reversal of mutualism as a mechanism for adaptive radiation in Yucca Moths. American Naturalist 156:S62-S76.

Perry, J. 2001. Indirect mutualism: how ants affect the Yucca-Yucca Moth relationship. Mémoire de baccalauréat spécialisé, University of Alberta, Edmonton. 34 p.

Powell, J.A. 1989. Synchronized, mass-emergences of a Yucca Moth, Prodoxus Y-inversus (Lepidoptera: Prodoxidae), after 16 and 17 years in diapause. Oecologia 81:490-493.

Powell, J.A. 2001. Longest insect dormancy: Yucca Moth larvae (Lepidoptera: Prodoxidae) metamorphose after 20, 25, and 30 years in diapause. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am.94:677-680.

Riley, C.V. 1873. On the oviposition of the Yucca Moth. Am. Nat. 7: 619-623.

Riley, C.V. 1892. The Yucca Moth and Yucca pollination.Ann. Rep. Missouri Bot. Gard. 3:99-158.

Samson, F. et F. nopf. 1994. Prairie conservation in North America.BioScience44:418-421.

Trelease, W. 1893. Further studies of Yuccas and their pollination. Fourth Annual Report of the Missouri Botanical Garden 4:181-226.

Walsingham, T. 1903. Review: A list of North American Lepidoptera and key to the literature of this order of insects. Ent. Mon. Mag. 39:257-261.

Webber, J.M. 1953. Yuccas of the Southwest. Agriculture Monograph No. 17, U.S. Department of Agriculture, 97 p.

Wilson, R.D. et J.F. Addicott. 1998. Regulation of mutualism between Yuccas and Yucca Moths: is oviposition behavior responsive to selective abscission of flowers?Oikos81: 109-118.