SARA: Report to Parliament, 2003-2004
I am pleased to provide Canadians with the Government of Canada's first report on the administration of the Species at Risk Act (SARA), covering the period June 2003 to December 2004. The Act received Royal Assent in December 2002 and came into force in phases.
SARA is designed as an important tool for the conservation and protection of Canada's species at risk, and it fulfills a key commitment under the United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity. It is one component of a three-part National Strategy for the Protection of Species at Risk. The other two are complementary stewardship programs and federal-provincial/territorial cooperation under the Accord for the Protection of Species at Risk.
The ultimate success of the Act will depend on the cooperation of the many different constituencies involved in its implementation. These include provincial, territorial and municipal governments, Aboriginal peoples, non-governmental organizations, industry, landowners and resource users, as well as other Canadians. SARA is a modern law that uses an innovative approach to the conservation of species at risk, focussing on the key elements of consultation, cooperation and stewardship. It is one of the first pieces of Canadian legislation with a fully transparent, open and on-line administration.
During this reporting period, considerable effort was expended in laying the foundations for the Act's administration and in conducting consultations on a number of implementation issues. In summary, Environment Canada, in cooperation with its partners, was involved in several key areas related to the administration and implementation of SARA, including the following activities:
For further information on actions being taken under SARA, or to comment on listing proposals and other documents, I invite all Canadians to consult the "Species at Risk Act Public Registry" Web site at www.sararegistry.gc.ca.
The proclamation of SARA brought to a close a nine-year process to enact legislation for the protection of Canada's species at risk and their critical habitat across the country. The Act, which received Royal Assent on December 12, 2002, came into force in phases. On June 5, 2003, the sections central to listing, stewardship and recovery of species at risk came into force. The Act's prohibitions and enforcement provisions came into effect on June 1, 2004. Further details of the phase-in schedule for SARA are presented below.
The report provides a summary of SARA-related activities that took place in 2003 and 2004. This introductory section also outlines the purposes of SARA and responsibilities under the Act. Subsequent sections describe activities in the following key areas: consultation and cooperation; stewardship; the List of Wildlife Species at Risk; measures to protect listed species; species recovery measures; compliance and enforcement; and the SARA Public Registry. To provide a context for this first annual report, the sections begin by providing background information on the topics covered.
This document meets the Minister of the Environment's obligation, under section 126 of SARA, to report on the administration of the Act during the preceding calendar year. The report is required to include a summary addressing the following matters:
The Act is a key tool for conserving and protecting Canada's biological diversity. Its purposes are to prevent wildlife species1 from being extirpated or becoming extinct, to provide for the recovery of wildlife species that are extirpated, endangered or threatened as a result of human activity, and to manage species of special concern to prevent them from becoming endangered or threatened.
The Act builds on and complements existing laws and agreements. These include the Fisheries Act, the Migratory Birds Convention Act, 1994, the Canada National Parks Act, the Canada Wildlife Act, the Wild Animal and Plant Protection and Regulation of International and Interprovincial Trade Act, the Convention on Biological Diversity, and the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora.
1 SARA defines a "wildlife species" as "a species, subspecies, variety or geographically or genetically distinct population of animal, plant or other organism, other than a bacterium or virus, that is wild by nature and (a) is native to Canada; or (b) has extended its range into Canada without human intervention and has been present in Canada for at least 50 years."
Three government bodies are involved in the Act's implementation:
The ministers responsible for these government organizations are referred to as "competent ministers" in SARA. They are given the authority to make decisions in their respective areas of responsibility and are required to consult with each other on specific SARA-related matters. Since December 12, 2003, the Minister of the Environment has been designated as the Minister responsible for PCA.
The Canadian Endangered Species Conservation Council (CESCC), established under the Accord for the Protection of Species at Risk, is recognized under SARA. It consists of federal, provincial and territorial government ministers who are responsible for the conservation and management of species at risk. The role of the CESCC, which must be consulted on a number of matters, is to:
Recognizing that the traditional knowledge of Aboriginal peoples of Canada should be considered in the assessment of species, SARA requires the establishment of a COSEWIC Aboriginal Traditional Knowledge Subcommittee. The Act also requires that a National Aboriginal Council on Species at Risk (NACOSAR) be established to advise the Minister of the Environment on the administration of the Act, and to provide advice and make recommendations to the CESCC.
The responsibility for the conservation of wildlife in Canada is shared among the federal, provincial and territorial governments. That is why they endorsed the Accord for the Protection of Species at Risk in 1996, committing to establish complementary legislation and programs for the protection and recovery of species at risk throughout Canada. They agreed to coordinate their activities through the CESCC.
Three federal government bodies have responsibilities under SARA. Consultation and cooperation among them is therefore also required.
Aboriginal peoples and wildlife management boards established under land claims agreements play an essential role in the conservation of wildlife in Canada. The government will work closely with them to ensure their participation in the implementation of the Act, including species assessment and recovery efforts.
The challenge of protecting species at risk and their critical habitat directly affects landowners and resource users where these species are found. SARA is designed to give landowners and communities the first opportunity to protect critical habitat through voluntary conservation efforts, encouraged by incentives. The Act sets out a process through which everyone involved can work together.
The Canadian Wildlife Directors' Committee (CWDC), consisting of federal, provincial, and territorial wildlife directors, is a key mechanism for interjurisdictional cooperation on species at risk issues. Its role is to provide leadership in the development and coordination of policies, strategies, programs and activities that address wildlife issues of national concern and contribute to the conservation of biodiversity; and to provide advice and support to Deputies' and Ministers' Councils on these matters. Since SARA came into force, the CWDC has met three times: in October 2003 and in May and October 2004, and the CESCC twice: in September 2003 and again in September 2004. The Deputy Ministers' Councils also meet annually in June to review biodiversity, sustainable development and species at risk issues and finalize the agendas for the Ministers' Councils.
Discussions were ongoing between the federal government and the provinces/territories on the development of bilateral agreements. The goal of these agreements is to ensure coordinated approaches to the delivery of species at risk programs in all jurisdictions.
In June 2004, EC hosted a two-day workshop to consult with the provinces and territories on policies and guidelines related to SARA. The primary objective of this workshop was to obtain feedback on various SARA policies and technical guidance, including permitting, recovery feasibility, technical guidelines for describing residence, for establishing population and distribution objectives and for identifying critical habitat. Secondary objectives were to identify provincial and territorial priorities for policy and guideline development, and to discuss approaches for involvement. Approximately 50 people attended this workshop, including one or two representatives from each provincial/territorial wildlife agency, and representatives from EC, DFO and PCA. Presentations at the workshop stimulated discussions and resulted in several important additions and changes to the proposed policies and guidelines. The proceedings of the workshop, which outline specific comments on the various policies and guidelines, were prepared and distributed to workshop participants. Following the workshop, EC consulted with the provinces and territories on several additional policies and guidelines through the National Recovery Working Group.
At the federal level, committees composed of senior officials from EC, DFO and PCA are in place to resolve policy and strategic issues, and to monitor implementation. These committees meet on a regular basis.
During 2003 and 2004, the Aboriginal Working Group on Species at Risk and representatives from EC, DFO and PCA drafted the terms of reference for NACOSAR. The Aboriginal Working Group included national and regional representatives of all national Aboriginal organizations and some regional organizations. Membership of the Council, which was established in 2004, includes the former co-chair of the Aboriginal Working Group and one representative from each of the five following national organizations:
COSEWIC and the Aboriginal Working Group on Species at Risk finalized terms of reference for COSEWIC's Aboriginal Traditional Knowledge Subcommittee. The work of this subcommittee will facilitate the inclusion of Aboriginal traditional knowledge into the species assessment process, as is required under SARA.
In 2004, a Species at Risk Advisory Committee was established to advise the Minister of the Environment and the CESCC on the administration of SARA. The Advisory Committee has a maximum membership of 22. The membership for 2004/2005 is ten participants from industry, nine representatives of environmental non-governmental organizations (NGOs), and two members serving in their individual scientific capacity. As set out in the terms of reference, the Committee will meet at least once a year with the Minister of the Environment. It may also meet with the Minister of Fisheries and Oceans, as appropriate, to discuss species at risk issues directly related to his or her mandate as competent minister for aquatic species. Representatives from EC, DFO and PCA attend meetings of the Committee, but they are not considered members. The Advisory Committee met three times in 2004.
Photo: KING RAIL, RALLUS ELEGANS. ENDANGERED.
Efforts have been made to inform and engage different audiences in species at risk conservation. The species at risk Web site (http://www.speciesatrisk.gc.ca) provides fact sheets on the biology of species, as well as concrete ideas of what Canadians can do in their daily lives to help protect species at risk. Since the Act came into force, fact sheets for about 80 species have been added or updated, and promotional material has been produced to invite citizens to visit the site and to prompt them to take action to protect and conserve species at risk. The Web site receives about 60,000 visits per month.
In June 2004, a pilot training course on public engagement was offered to recovery teams, in order to help them build and enhance their skills to engage people in species at risk recovery actions. Six more courses will be offered to recovery practitioners across Canada in 2005/2006.
In 2003, the well-known Hinterland Who's Who series of fact sheets and video clips about wildlife was relaunched. Three clips and fact sheets on species at risk were part of the initial launch. An additional clip and two new fact sheets about species at risk were later added to the series.
SARA recognizes that:
Thus, the Act encourages stewardship and cooperation through provisions for conservation agreements and joint species at risk programs. The relevant provisions concern:
As part of the National Strategy for the Protection of Species at Risk, the federal government established the Habitat Stewardship Program (HSP) for Species at Risk in 2000. The program allocates up to $10 million annually to projects that conserve and protect species at risk and their habitats. The goal of the HSP is to "contribute to the recovery of endangered, threatened and other species at risk, and to prevent other species from becoming a conservation concern, by engaging Canadians from all walks of life in conservation actions to benefit wildlife." Within this overall goal and interpretation, the HSP has three objectives:
Contribution funding under the HSP is intended to enable recipients to plan, manage and complete projects that will achieve the program goal. In support of the program objectives, project results are expected in three key areas: securing or protecting important habitat to protect species at risk and support their recovery; mitigating threats to species at risk caused by human activities; and supporting the implementation of other priority activities in recovery strategies or action plans.
The HSP is administered by EC and is managed cooperatively with PCA and DFO. A secretariat based in the National Capital Region supports the regional structure. Further information on the HSP is available at http://www.cws-scf.ec.gc.ca/hsp-pih/intro_e.cfm.
EC, DFO and PCA facilitate stewardship activities and promote compliance with SARA by producing promotional and educational materials, and by organizing educational activities. These materials and activities include, for example, the Public Registry, an electronic information bulletin, posters, information sessions, learning activities, Web features, curricula and other public education projects.
No conservation agreements were completed pursuant to sections 10 to 13 of SARA during 2003 or 2004.
The HSP continues as an active federal effort to engage Canadians in stewardship and has become a key element of SARA implementation. In 2003, the HSP implemented a Results-based Management and Accountability Framework and a Risk-based Audit Framework to ensure that the program is meeting the requirements for a contribution program and is directed toward results.
For the purpose of this report, results will be presented for the 2003/2004 and 2004/2005 fiscal years, as the HSP compiles results on a fiscal year basis. From June 2003 to March 2005, 342 projects addressed terrestrial and aquatic species at risk issues in all provinces and territories. The total value of the projects was approximately $60 million, including a $19-million investment from the HSP.
Of those 342 projects:
Projects under the HSP addressed both the habitat and threat mitigation of some 200 COSEWIC-listed species. Approximately half of the funds were allocated to landscape/seascape (e.g., valley, watershed) and multi- species projects.
To ensure that the HSP is, and remains, on track to achieve its goals, a national evaluation of the program was conducted in 2003/2004. The evaluation concluded that the program is working effectively and that, to achieve Canada's species at risk objectives, there is a continuing need for the type of activities funded by the HSP and executed by its funding recipients. In response to this evaluation and the proclamation of SARA, a national workshop was held to gather perspectives from across the country (from both governmental and non- governmental representatives) on future directions and priorities for the HSP, as well as on actions that could be taken to improve its implementation. The workshop was very successful. The resulting recommendations are now being considered in discussions on program direction and decision-making.
As a result of both program evaluation and the national workshop, extensive policy development took place in 2004. These policies ensure that the HSP is consistent in its national implementation, while still respecting regional needs and differences.
Openness and transparency, including public consultation, are required to make decisions about which species should be added to Schedule 1, the List of Wildlife Species at Risk.
SARA sets out a process by which a wildlife species may be added, reclassified, or removed from Schedule 1. The process begins with the assessment of a species as being at risk by COSEWIC, using the best available information. Upon receipt of these assessments, the Minister of the Environment has 90 days to report on how he or she intends to respond to each assessment and, to the extent possible, provide timelines for action. These response statements are posted on the Public Registry. The Minister of the Environment submits the assessments to the Governor in Council (GIC) for receipt. This begins the nine-month timeline for the GIC, on the recommendation of the Minister of the Environment, to make a decision on whether to (1) accept COSEWIC's assessment and add the species to Schedule 1; (2) not add the species to Schedule 1; or (3) refer the species back to COSEWIC for further consideration or information. If the GIC has not made a decision within nine months, the Minister of the Environment must amend Schedule 1 in accordance with COSEWIC's assessment.
Status assessments by COSEWIC ensure that species are evaluated through a rigorous and independent scientific process that operates at arm's length from governments. Members of COSEWIC are experts on wildlife species at risk. Their backgrounds are in the fields of biology, ecology, genetics, Aboriginal traditional knowledge, and other relevant disciplines. They come from various communities, including government, academia, Aboriginal organizations and NGOs.
The degree of risk to a species is categorized as extirpated, endangered, threatened or of special concern. COSEWIC can also consider whether a species is extinct, not at risk or data deficient. For details of the risk categories, more information on the Committee, or to view the COSEWIC annual report, visit http://www.cosewic.gc.ca.
When the Act came into force in June 2003, there were 233 species on Schedule 1. COSEWIC had already assessed or reassessed these species as at risk, using criteria updated in October 1998 and current status information. With the Act's coming into force, Schedule 1 became the legal List of Wildlife Species at Risk.
COSEWIC will provide its assessments and supporting evidence (i.e., rationale and status reports) once a year to the Minister of the Environment. These reports will be provided in bilingual format, consistent with the Government of Canada's publications policy and in compliance with the Official Languages Act. Receipt of the species assessments by the Minister begins the 90-day response period.
During 2003, staff from EC, DFO and PCA contributed information and expertise to the COSEWIC process, helping to ensure that assessments were based on the best possible information and evaluation approaches. In November 2004, DFO organized a peer review meeting to examine information on aquatic species that are candidates for a COSEWIC assessment, in order to ensure that high-quality information was provided to the Committee. COSEWIC status report authors, university scientists, and non-governmental stakeholders participated in the meeting along with DFO scientists.
COSEWIC assessed a combined total of 115 species at its meetings in May 2002, November 2002, and May 2003. These 115 assessments were forwarded to the Minister of the Environment in January 2004. Of the 115 species, 91 were assessed as being extirpated, endangered, threatened or of special concern.
On April 21, 2004, as required under subsection 25(3) of SARA, the Minister of the Environment posted statements on the Public Registry on how he intended to respond to COSEWIC's assessments of the 115 species. Of the 91 species assessed as being at risk, the Minister forwarded assessments of 79 to the GIC on April 21, 2004. Extended consultations are taking place on the remaining 12 species before assessments are transmitted to the GIC for receipt in early 2005. These species include boccacio, cusk, interior Fraser coho salmon and several populations of Atlantic Cod. The listing of these species could have significant and widespread impacts on the activities of Aboriginal peoples, commercial and recreational fishers, and Canadians at large. Concerned citizens need to be informed of the potential impacts of a listing decision, and be given the opportunity to express their opinions and share ideas on how best to protect and/or recover the species. Although these 12 species are proceeding through an extended consultation process, they are currently covered by conservation frameworks, and active conservation measures have already been taken for many of them.
In Victoria, on March 3, 2004, the Minister of the Environment launched the consultations for the first amendment to the List of Wildlife Species at Risk under SARA at the opening session of the Species at Risk 2004: Pathways to Discovery conference. With his announcement, the Minister also released Consultation on Amending the List of Species under the Species at Risk Act, March 2004. This document pertains to the 63 terrestrial species (out of the total 115 species) that were being considered for addition to Schedule 1. It was posted on the Public Registry on March 3, 2004, and comments were due by May 15, 2004. The document was mailed to 10 wildlife management boards and approximately 400 Aboriginal groups. A postcard announcing the commencement of the consultations and the document's availability on the Public Registry was sent to over 3000 NGOs, individuals and some municipalities. Letters and a copy of the document were sent to the provincial and territorial ministers concerned.
DFO consultations on whether or not to add 16 aquatic species to Schedule 1 of SARA, initiated at the same time, were facilitated through workbooks and other supporting documents which were posted on the Public Registry and the DFO Website. Workbooks were also mailed directly to other government departments, stakeholders, Aboriginal peoples and NGOs. Meetings were held with interested or potentially affected individuals, organizations, and Aboriginal peoples. Consultations were organized as efficiently as possible by grouping species according to their geographical location and by using existing mechanisms, such as pre-scheduled recovery strategy workshops or regular industry consultation meetings.
PCA worked closely with EC and DFO to ensure that its stakeholders were consulted on this first amendment to Schedule 1 and to avoid duplication of consultation efforts.
On October 23, 2004, the Minister of the Environment's proposed recommendations with regard to the 79 species received by the GIC in April was published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, for a final 30-day period of public review and comment. This proposed recommendation was based on scientific assessments by COSEWIC and on consultations with Canadian governments, Aboriginal peoples, wildlife management boards, stakeholders and the Canadian public, and on an analysis of benefits and costs to Canadians. The Minister proposed that 76 species be added to Schedule 1, that the Cultus and Sakinaw Lake populations of Pacific sockeye salmon not be added to Schedule 1, and that the speckled dace be referred back to COSEWIC for further information or consideration.
In addition to the recommendation to add 76 species to Schedule 1, the Minister recommended correcting spelling, typographical and taxonomic errors for 55 species already listed in Schedule 1. The order would also remove a total of 43 species from Schedule 2 (16 species) and Schedule 3 (27 species) of the Act because these species are proposed for addition to Schedule 1. As a result of this amendment, the names of species in Schedule 1 will correspond to the ones currently used by COSEWIC.
The 30-day public comment period closed on November 22, 2004. More than 50 responses were received from groups and individuals, primarily with regard to the proposed recommendations not to add the two sockeye salmon populations to Schedule 1 following the publication of the proposals in the Canada Gazette, Part I. The order amending Schedule 1, and the Regulatory Impact Analysis Statement (which summarized all comments received and responses to them) were published in the Canada Gazette, Part II, on January 26, 2005.
At its November 2003 and May 2004 meetings, COSEWIC assessed a combined total of 51 species as being extirpated, endangered, threatened or of special concern. On October 23, 2004, as required under subsection 25(3) of SARA, the Minister of the Environment posted on the Public Registry statements on how he intends to respond to these assessments. The GIC acknowledged receipt of 44 of the 51 species assessments, by order pursuant to subsection 23(1) of the Act, on October 19, 2004.
Extended consultations are taking place on the remaining seven species before the assessments are transmitted to the GIC in 2005. These species include five populations of the beluga whale, the porbeagle shark and the white sturgeon. The listing of these species could have significant and widespread impacts on the activities of Aboriginal peoples, commercial and recreational fishers and Canadians at large. Concerned citizens need to be informed of the potential impacts of a listing decision and be given the opportunity to express their opinions, and share ideas on how best to protect and/or recover the species. Although these species are proceeding through an extended consultation process, they are currently covered by conservation frameworks, and active conservation measures have already been taken for many of them. Consultation meetings are currently being held with interested or potentially affected individuals, organizations, and Aboriginal peoples across the country. The length of the consultation period varied with the species; for some, it was extended until March 31, 2005.
Consultations on the second amendment to the List of Wildlife Species at Risk under SARA was launched November 23, 2004, with the posting on the Public Registry of Consultation on Amending the List of Species under the Species at Risk Act: November 2004. Close to 1200 copies of the document were distributed to targeted stakeholders. A postcard announcing the consultation was mailed out to about 2000 interest groups and individuals across Canada. Regional wildlife staff contacted wildlife management boards, inviting them to participate in the consultations. EC regional offices are developing plans that will involve direct consultations with targeted stakeholders.
DFO consultations on whether or not to add the 14 aquatic species in this group began in the fall of 2004. Consultation workbooks were posted on the Public Registry and the DFO Web site, and they were mailed directly to other government departments, stakeholders, Aboriginal peoples, wildlife management boards and NGOs.
PCA is working closely with EC and DFO to ensure that its stakeholders are consulted on this second amendment to Schedule 1 and to avoid duplication of consultation efforts.
The protection that comes into effect following the addition of a species to Schedule 1 of SARA depends upon the degree of risk assigned to the species, the type of species, and where it occurs (see below).
The Act provides authority for the government to take action, including emergency action, to protect a species listed on Schedule 1, or its habitat. When the competent minister is of the opinion that a listed wildlife species is facing imminent threats to its survival or recovery, he or she must recommend to the Governor in Council that an emergency order be issued. An emergency order can prohibit activities that may adversely affect the species or its habitat.
Sections 73 to 78 of SARA pertain to the issuance of agreements, permits, licences, orders and other similar documents that authorize people to carry out activities that would otherwise be an offence under SARA. The following activities may be allowed when it is established that all reasonable alternatives have been considered and the best solution has been adopted, when all feasible measures will be taken to minimize the impact of the activity, and when the survival or recovery of the species will not be jeopardized:
The sections of the Act dealing with prohibitions came into force in June 2004. During 2003, considerable effort was expended in laying the foundations for the administration of the Act. A draft permit policy was produced to support the relevant sections of SARA (sections 73 to 78). The paper considered options for addressing permitting and it considered aspects of the Act where a competent minister has discretion. The paper also addressed the interpretation of specific terms in SARA. The draft paper was reviewed by staff in EC, DFO, and PCA. No permits were issued in 2003.
Three orders were made under SARA in 2003. The first one made changes to related federal laws. Sections 134 to 136 and 138 to 141 of SARA set out amendments to the Canada Wildlife Act, the Migratory Birds Convention Act, 1994 and the Wild Animal and Plant Protection and Regulation of International and Interprovincial Trade Act. These amendments came into force, by order, on March 24, 2003. The second and third orders were made on June 5, 2003. One established the phased implementation of the Act, and the other extended the deadlines for when species on Schedule 2 had to be reassessed to three years after the date of the first phase of implementation of the Act. The extension was necessary to ensure that COSEWIC would be able to meet its time commitments under the Act.
During 2003, the federal government developed a draft Environmental Assessment Best Practice Guide for Wildlife at Risk in Canada, which includes an appendix specific to SARA requirements. The draft guide was widely circulated among federal and provincial agencies, and it was published in early 2004. It can be accessed at http://www.cws-scf.ec.gc.ca/publications/eval/guide/index_e.cfm. In 2003, federal departments also developed a draft procedural guide specific to the federal environmental assessment process as it relates to SARA requirements.
In 2004, DFO issued approximately 9600 permits under paragraph 73(3)(c) of SARA in the Atlantic Region for wolffish and 72 for leatherback turtle to fishers whose activities might incidentally harm these listed species, after peer-reviewed assessments determined that the level of harm from bycatch would not jeopardize survival or recovery. Explanations of why the Minister of Fisheries and Oceans authorized these permits are available on the Public Registry. DFO developed a process for issuing scientific permits for activities that might affect listed species under section 73 of SARA. A total of 16 scientific permits were issued for research in freshwaters and six for research in marine waters. Posting of the explanations is under way.
EC issued 21 permits in order to allow monitoring, inventory and management work to proceed on a variety of species of birds, mammals, reptiles and plants. An additional 14 permits were issued to authorize banding of migratory birds.
In 2004, PCA launched a new on-line research and collection permit system that incorporates SARA requirements for research taking place on the lands administered by the Agency. PCA also provided guidance on SARA permitting requirements and has been developing detailed training for its employees. The Agency is ensuring that current permitting meets SARA guidelines.
Federal policy discussion papers on critical habitat and residence were written in 2003, and a federal-provincial/ territorial workshop to discuss these issues was held in January 2004. The critical habitat discussion document was posted on the Public Registry on March 1, 2004, while the residence discussion paper was posted on April 1, 2004. The consultation period for both documents ended on May 15, 2004. In addition, a workshop with national industry and environmental NGOs was held in March 2004. Comments from all federal, provincial and non-governmental partners, as well as the public, were used to refine the documents.
A proposed policy for describing residence was developed by a federal working group involving EC, DFO and PCA. The guidelines contain (1) an interpretation of SARA and policy directives on what a residence is, (2) guidance on determining whether the residence concept applies to a particular species, (3) guidance on the format and content of residence descriptions, (4) a process for developing and approving residence descriptions, (5) templates for writing, tracking, and evaluating residence descriptions, and (6) several examples of residence descriptions for a variety of taxa. The proposed policy was reviewed with provincial and territorial government representatives at two workshops in 2004 organized by Environment Canada. Pending final federal approval the process for describing residences is being implemented provisionally by EC, DFO, PCA, and the provinces and territories. Descriptions will be posted on the SARA Registry and included in Recovery Strategies.
Technical guidelines for establishing population and distribution objectives, and for identifying critical habitat, have been developed by a federal working group led by EC and including DFO and P